View Single Post
Old 05-04-2012, 12:03 PM   #47
HarryT
eBook Enthusiast
HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
HarryT's Avatar
 
Posts: 85,557
Karma: 93980341
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: UK
Device: Kindle Oasis 2, iPad Pro 10.5", iPhone 6
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ninjalawyer View Post
I don't usually agree with HarryT, but I wouldn't be opposed to having an account holder responsible if the penalties were restricted to reasonable fines rather than massive fines and criminal sanctions, and provided the person accused had some meaningful way to dispute the claim. Seems like a fairly reasonable compromise.
That's precisely my point. It's the ludicrous penalties that up the ante for everyone here. Make the punishment fit the crime - a low-level fine for a low-level misdemeanour - and perhaps there will be a greater level of realism in the whole affair.
HarryT is offline   Reply With Quote