View Single Post
Old 05-02-2012, 08:50 PM   #85
Ninjalawyer
Guru
Ninjalawyer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Ninjalawyer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Ninjalawyer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Ninjalawyer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Ninjalawyer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Ninjalawyer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Ninjalawyer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Ninjalawyer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Ninjalawyer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Ninjalawyer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Ninjalawyer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Ninjalawyer's Avatar
 
Posts: 826
Karma: 18573626
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Canada
Device: Kobo Touch, Nexus 7 (2013)
Quote:
Originally Posted by HansTWN View Post
I don't see The Pirate Bay as having anything to do with free speech. It is a website specifically for illegal distribution of copyrighted materials.
Whether or not you like the content of The Pirate Bay, its content clearly is speech, so the freedom to express it has everything to do with free speech; the argument that it's not is a non-starter. This is particularly the case with the Pirate Bay as they're hosting no files and do in fact have non-infringing sections (e.g. The Promo Bay).

Now if you'd said that you think blocking the UK public from viewing The Pirate Bay is a reasonable limit to free speech in the UK, I would disagree but would respect that you have a defensible position. Of course, then I would point out that even if you agree with blocking The Pirate Bay, you should admit that this case sets some disturbing precedent with respect to a party being able to sue another party to block a website from public access.
Ninjalawyer is offline   Reply With Quote