View Single Post
Old 04-30-2012, 10:24 AM   #210
pruss
Evangelist
pruss ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pruss ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pruss ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pruss ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pruss ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pruss ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pruss ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pruss ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pruss ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pruss ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pruss ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 461
Karma: 819417
Join Date: Nov 2004
Quote:
Originally Posted by HarryT View Post
Certainly grammar changes - English didn't have a "continuous present" at the time that Shakespeare was writing, for example ("I am going", "you are reading", etc.) - but there's a difference between grammatical changes and not knowing the difference between "its" and "it's"; the latter is just dumb ignorance which there's absolutely no excuse or reason for.
Right now, yes. But the difference in spelling might one day disappear. And we may be seeing it disappear. Orthography is defined by the practices of the language users. (Not in any simple majority way, though.)
pruss is offline   Reply With Quote