View Single Post
Old 04-28-2012, 08:20 PM   #80
ATimson
Evangelist
ATimson ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ATimson ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ATimson ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ATimson ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ATimson ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ATimson ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ATimson ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ATimson ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ATimson ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ATimson ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ATimson ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
ATimson's Avatar
 
Posts: 456
Karma: 1044878
Join Date: Apr 2009
Device: Kindle Paperwhite 4
Quote:
Originally Posted by Barcey View Post
Please explain how your disagreeing with this assumption totally invalidates my argument that a comparison of two pricing scenarios should use the same list price and the same starting profit margin.
You're using profit margin incorrectly. Stores may have an overall profit margin of about 30%, but the number you actually need to be using for your comparisons is the discount the publisher/wholesaler offers to the retailer. And that discount is about 50%, your assertion to the contrary.

(The difference between the discount and the profit margin is eaten up by the retailer's various costs - staff, leases, etc.)

Because you're using invalid numbers and invalid terms, your argument has no basis in fact.
ATimson is offline   Reply With Quote