View Single Post
Old 04-27-2012, 01:27 PM   #114
QuantumIguana
Philosopher
QuantumIguana ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.QuantumIguana ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.QuantumIguana ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.QuantumIguana ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.QuantumIguana ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.QuantumIguana ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.QuantumIguana ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.QuantumIguana ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.QuantumIguana ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.QuantumIguana ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.QuantumIguana ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
QuantumIguana's Avatar
 
Posts: 2,034
Karma: 18736532
Join Date: Jan 2012
Device: Kindle Paperwhite 2 gen, Kindle Fire 1st Gen, Kindle Touch
Quote:
Originally Posted by Giggleton View Post
Yes, all contracts are meaningless unless all parties agree to all terms. It seems to me that if everyone just read whatever they felt like reading and paid who they can what they could, everything would be fine.

Why are people against this idea?? Which is just a manifestation of freedom?
If you don't want to enter into a contract, then don't enter into the contract, by all means. But if you don't agree to the terms of the contract, you don't get the book. If walk into a restaurant, and don't agree to pay for a hamburger, I don't get a hamburger. I can't say "I don't agree to this contract, so give it to me anyway." What you propose isn't freedom, but serfdom. You would turn authors into your serfs.
QuantumIguana is offline   Reply With Quote