I assume at Ectaco are generally capable of assuming a rational decision, and also consider possible a mistake on their side. I also believe none of you has certain informations about this case.
It wasn't that difficult to understand, seen? Don't smack yourself with your own words.
Some of you people seem to consider Ectaco as a demented company to be saved from its own incapacity, someone even ended up insulting Valentinka as a possible robber. I think it's just the same old trolling from someone who just wants this thread closed.
But it's hilarious how you keep fueling this thread even if you just hate it.