View Single Post
Old 04-25-2012, 09:26 AM   #20
JoeD
Guru
JoeD ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JoeD ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JoeD ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JoeD ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JoeD ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JoeD ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JoeD ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JoeD ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JoeD ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JoeD ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JoeD ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 895
Karma: 4383958
Join Date: Nov 2007
Device: na
Quote:
Originally Posted by pidgeon92 View Post
Interestingly, the publishing "exec" quoted in the article seems to be careful to blame DRM on the retailers, not on the publishers.
At the moment retailers tend to blame the publishers for insisting on it, publishers blame the retailers. Nobody wants to be the "bad" guy. However, I think retailers are the ones standing to gain the most from having DRM since it provides vendor lock-in.

If most publishers publicly go DRM free, then over time customers will be advised not to shop at certain stores that insist on applying DRM anyway since it's then clear the motivations are lock-in.
JoeD is offline   Reply With Quote