Quote:
Originally Posted by itimpi
Support for User defined fields has been on the 'nice to have' list for some time, but it is a non-trivial feature to implement and there is no ETA for when/if it might become available.
Part of the reason has been around GUI related design issues and the structure of generated sub-catalogs. Do you see any advantage to supporting it within the Filter/search capability only? It occurs to me that if it was limited to that it might be easier to implement.
|
My use currently would be simply to use #read:"=tw" in the "Featured Books" section or perhaps the "Custom Catalog". I haven't played with the latter and don't really understand how it works or what it generates.