View Single Post
Old 04-23-2012, 10:08 AM   #12
gmw
cacoethes scribendi
gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
gmw's Avatar
 
Posts: 5,818
Karma: 137770742
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Australia
Device: Kobo Aura One & H2Ov2, Sony PRS-650
The importance of capturing a reader's attention early in a book is common advice - and makes sense - whether it be the "first three pages" that Justin mentioned, or the first third suggested by LuvReadin. What I have found myself staring at on occasion is the importance that some advice places on the opening sentence.

Such advice manages to come up with some wonderful examples, some authors have found exactly the right opening for their book. It's great when you see it done well, you can really admire it, BUT is the first sentence in particular that important to the reader's acceptance of book?

It seems to me that a book must set the tone clearly, and capture a reader's interest within the first few pages (I know, that sounds awfully like agreeing with Justin again ), but I wonder if too much emphasis on the opening sentence and paragraph is like having every book cast from the same mold. Or am I wrong? Is it worth rewriting and rewriting that first page until the very first sentence tells a story in itself?
gmw is offline   Reply With Quote