View Single Post
Old 04-20-2012, 11:46 AM   #9
RHWright
Addict
RHWright ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.RHWright ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.RHWright ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.RHWright ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.RHWright ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.RHWright ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.RHWright ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.RHWright ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.RHWright ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.RHWright ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.RHWright ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 219
Karma: 2617122
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: North Carolina
Device: NOOK ST, Nexus 7
Not sure what they're trying to go for here. And the iPad vs. ereader thing doesn't seem a good comparison.

Now, an interesting study of consumer behavior, IMO, would be set up along these lines:

Find a group of soon-to-purchase consumers that strongly identify themselves as readers and plan to do a substantial amount of daily reading on the device. I.e. those for whom the reading function is a major factor in the purchase decision.

Then see how many go with a primarily reading device (Kindle, Nook, Kobo, etc), how many with what I call an expanded use device (Kindle Fire, Nook Tablet, etc), and how many choose a more general multi-use device (iPad, Android tablet, etc).

Some data on initial estimated spend versus final purchase price might be nice too.

My gut says those for whom the reading is a top need for the device are choosing dedicated devices, especially at a lower budget. Those for whom reading is less important and/or who have a higher budget in mind are probably going toward tablets.

It would be nice to see data on that. I could be totally wrong.
RHWright is offline   Reply With Quote