View Single Post
Old 04-18-2012, 08:52 AM   #131
Prestidigitweeze
Fledgling Demagogue
Prestidigitweeze ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Prestidigitweeze ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Prestidigitweeze ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Prestidigitweeze ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Prestidigitweeze ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Prestidigitweeze ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Prestidigitweeze ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Prestidigitweeze ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Prestidigitweeze ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Prestidigitweeze ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Prestidigitweeze ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Prestidigitweeze's Avatar
 
Posts: 2,384
Karma: 31132263
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: White Plains
Device: Clara HD; Oasis 2; Aura HD; iPad Air; PRS-350; Galaxy S7.
As a long-term editor of literary magazines, small press novels and major press anthologies, I can tell you that most authors I've dealt with will fight to the death for their original wording. Besides which, it's a mistake to invest dead authors with imagined behavior unless you're writing about them as characters.

As an author who's published a fair bit, I can tell you I'd be incredibly annoyed at those kinds of substitutions after going through thirty-seven drafts to get the rhythm and diction just right.

Glad we agree that people who call for Muckraker's public shaming and boycott the vast publishing empire in his garage might be overreacting.

The honest thing to do is to add a disclaimer showing you've changed the language if in fact that's what you've done. If you're publishing Lewis Carroll but have changed a few words, then be good enough to tell us that.

Last edited by Prestidigitweeze; 04-18-2012 at 08:58 AM.
Prestidigitweeze is offline   Reply With Quote