View Single Post
Old 04-18-2012, 05:06 AM   #33
murraypaul
Interested Bystander
murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 3,726
Karma: 19728152
Join Date: Jun 2008
Device: Note 4, Kobo One
Quote:
Originally Posted by stonetools View Post
I got that. The Supreme Court case says that in certain cases, suppliers fixing minimum prices could be legal , so an agreement to do it is permissible .
A retailer doing it is permissible.
Multiple retailers colluding to do it is not permissible.
Competitors acting in concert to perform an otherwise legal act can be illegal.
murraypaul is offline   Reply With Quote