View Single Post
Old 04-17-2012, 04:51 PM   #468
fjtorres
Grand Sorcerer
fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 11,732
Karma: 128354696
Join Date: May 2009
Location: 26 kly from Sgr A*
Device: T100TA,PW2,PRS-T1,KT,FireHD 8.9,K2, PB360,BeBook One,Axim51v,TC1000
Quote:
Originally Posted by rhadin View Post
Amazon shouldn't care but the DoJ should care. The DoJ is supposed to represent the interests of the consumer in this fight, not the interests of Amazon. It isn't in the consumer's interest for only Amazon to be left standing.

I think that is the essence of the argument.
No. The DOJ should *NOT* care.
*That* is the essence of the argument.
The letter of the law.

At most, you could argue that "somebody" in Congress should care.
(Say, the Senator from Apple. Or from Google.)
But they don't.
500-plus politicians and none has raised a peep: that should tell you which way the wind blows.

DOJ has one mission: enforce the letter of the law, *not* set policy.
Policy is for Congress.

Last edited by fjtorres; 04-17-2012 at 04:53 PM.
fjtorres is offline   Reply With Quote