View Single Post
Old 04-16-2012, 05:40 PM   #12
fjtorres
Grand Sorcerer
fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 11,732
Karma: 128354696
Join Date: May 2009
Location: 26 kly from Sgr A*
Device: T100TA,PW2,PRS-T1,KT,FireHD 8.9,K2, PB360,BeBook One,Axim51v,TC1000
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kali Yuga View Post
Errr....
2) They can't simply terminate all their leases, return all their books and wash their hands of the brick & mortar business.
That is the biggest problem B&N (and other "Big Box" retailers) face. Their storefronts are massive fixed costs that are making up an ever-increasing fraction of their operating costs as their pbook sales decline. That is *exactly* the reason Borders wasn't able to find a buyer for even their profitable sites.

Those leases are positively toxic so they have to find ways of monetizing that relatively expensive floorspace.

The one thing they most *need* to do is the one thing they *can't* easily do.

The analysts in question are saying that they don't think B&N can grow their Nook income fast enough to make up the (expected) decline in pbook income. It is up to B&N management to give the lie to that assessment by executing.
fjtorres is offline   Reply With Quote