View Single Post
Old 04-16-2012, 04:28 PM   #21
murraypaul
Interested Bystander
murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 3,726
Karma: 19728152
Join Date: Jun 2008
Device: Note 4, Kobo One
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crossroad Press View Post
I believe you'll find, upon further research, that in the US (in any case) It's not so much the "rights" as the copyright that is in question. If a work goes out of copyright, and no one is the heir to the estate, then (according to the silly life plus 70 years thing) - or so lawyers have told me - no one can publish the work. It has no copyright, and there is no one with a valid claim to establish a new copyright - though, of course, if you could find an office in the "state" who was willing to give it a shot, precedent might be set. I doubt the state would do that for free, though, and what is most likely is that some really high price, or percentage would be set by a government office with no idea the actual worth - or lack thereof - and the project would die.
I don't understand your post.
If a work goes out of copyright, it is in the public domain, and anyone can publish a copy. No, they don't get a new copyright, why should they?
If you are still inside life+70 of the writer, then the work hasn't gone out of copyright.
murraypaul is offline   Reply With Quote