View Single Post
Old 04-16-2012, 01:06 PM   #426
JoeD
Guru
JoeD ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JoeD ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JoeD ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JoeD ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JoeD ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JoeD ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JoeD ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JoeD ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JoeD ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JoeD ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JoeD ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 898
Karma: 4383958
Join Date: Nov 2007
Device: na
Quote:
Originally Posted by Elfwreck View Post
It does matter whether it was for the good of the ebook market; if they can prove (or show reasonable evidence to support) that they were preventing a collapse of the industry, or that Amazon was going to jack prices up to $18/book as soon as they'd driven BN.com and Diesel out of business, they'd have a potential excuse for raising prices for consumers.
Are you sure on that? Whilst I'm certainly not a lawyer and don't play one on TV, from what I've read, the reason behind price fixing doesn't matter. Whether prices are increased or lowered for a good reason or not.

Not the most reliable source I'll concede, but I had a quick google and turned up
this on wikipedia
:

Quote:
In the United States, agreements to fix, raise, lower, stabilize, or otherwise set a price are illegal per se.[7] It does not matter if the price agreed upon is reasonable or for a good or altruistic cause or if the agreement is unspoken and tacit.
JoeD is offline   Reply With Quote