View Single Post
Old 04-16-2012, 02:33 AM   #41
Fbone
Is that a sandwich?
Fbone ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Fbone ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Fbone ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Fbone ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Fbone ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Fbone ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Fbone ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Fbone ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Fbone ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Fbone ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Fbone ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 8,298
Karma: 101697116
Join Date: Jun 2010
Device: Nook Glowlight Plus
Quote:
Originally Posted by 6charlong View Post
The thread has moved on but it should be noted that we already knew that Amazon was unlikely to be losing money selling best-sellers for $9.99. The new price for best-sellers that the Agency group wanted was $12.99. We already knew that 30% of the sales price went to the retailer. If we assume the agency model's new price for releases:

12.99 minus (30% of 12.99) = 9.093. Even under the agency model's higher prices Amazon would earn $0.897 per book if they were allowed to sell for $9.99. However, Apple's profit margin would be cut by almost $3 if they had to compete with Amazon's $9.99 price.
Prior to Agency Amazon was losing a few dollars on many bestsellers. This is public knowledge and not disputed by Amazon.

Wholesale prices were half of list about $12-15. So Amazon was selling below their cost for some titles. It's possible they were making up the difference on other titles.

But what about Kindle R&D, support, and marketing. Also, the KDP Select funds of $600,000/mos?
Fbone is offline   Reply With Quote