View Single Post
Old 04-15-2012, 08:22 PM   #68
theducks
Well trained by Cats
theducks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.theducks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.theducks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.theducks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.theducks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.theducks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.theducks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.theducks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.theducks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.theducks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.theducks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
theducks's Avatar
 
Posts: 31,145
Karma: 60406498
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: The Central Coast of California
Device: Kobo Libra2,Kobo Aura2v1, K4NT(Fixed: New Bat.), Galaxy Tab A
Quote:
Originally Posted by ProDigit View Post
I understand.
I just wanted to see if it would have any effect on hardware ebook reading devices (perhaps incompatibility?), or if one can make a book even smaller in overall size without downside.

Unfortunately the open community concerning the engineering of these devices is very small. It would be nice if someone had some lab tools to test to see if battery life of devices is affected with a highly compressed VS low compressed ebook.
There must be some sort of "perfect solution" (for lack of a better word in English) that one can have the best battery life and best compression in one package.

The unfortunate part is that power consumption already is so low, and it's very hard to actually measure power consumption on ebook reading.
Decompressing, 'higher compression' takes more CPU crunch power (that many devices don't have) and leads to increased battery consumption and slowness
theducks is offline   Reply With Quote