Quote:
Originally Posted by pwalker8
Certainly, it's not like the DOJ has never overstated their case, or even flat out lied in any previous attempts to nail someone. The DOJ has a pretty poor record as far as monopoly charges go, typically if the case actually goes to trial (most settle just to avoid the expense of going to trial), the defendant tends to win.
|
As at least one former DOJ prosecutor has been quoted as saying that in this case the DOJ has "the kind of evidence prosecutors dream about", I wouldn't hold my breath if I were you.