View Single Post
Old 04-14-2012, 05:18 PM   #350
stonetools
Wizard
stonetools ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.stonetools ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.stonetools ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.stonetools ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.stonetools ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.stonetools ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.stonetools ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.stonetools ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.stonetools ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.stonetools ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.stonetools ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
stonetools's Avatar
 
Posts: 2,016
Karma: 2838487
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Washington, DC
Device: Ipad, IPhone
Quote:
Originally Posted by DiapDealer View Post
That is the single most ridiculous, unknowable, unprovable bit of philosophical, paradoxical claptrap I think I've ever read on this subject. Shatzkin clearly favors the traditional publishing model. We get that. So why is it news that he condemns anything that may hurt that model?

I got news for Shatzkin: some of the best books don't get written now! And some of the best authors chose a completely different career. See how silly that sounds?
Actually, its annoyingly apropo. The question is not whether books will be written at all: the question is whether better books-especially better non-fiction books- will be written in an era where publishers will have less capital for financing authors. Your snark was irrelevant to that.
stonetools is offline   Reply With Quote