View Single Post
Old 04-14-2012, 10:21 AM   #338
ProfCrash
Tea Enthusiast
ProfCrash ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ProfCrash ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ProfCrash ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ProfCrash ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ProfCrash ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ProfCrash ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ProfCrash ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ProfCrash ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ProfCrash ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ProfCrash ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ProfCrash ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
ProfCrash's Avatar
 
Posts: 8,554
Karma: 75384937
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Somewhere in the USA
Device: Kindle1, Kindle DX Graphite, K3 3G, IPad 3, PW2
I am fascinated by the idea that Amazon was a monopoly when Apple had yet to even enter the market, BN was about a year into the e-market, and Kobo was relatively new. Yes, Sony had been there but even people who owned Sony's before the Kindle would tell you that the bookstore sucked.

So Amazon was a bad, evil, monopoly because they put together the first successful, large e-book store before three other competitors even entered the market?

Before you entered the market?

Really?

That is your argument?

Seriously?

I think a second grader might be able to find a problem or two with that logic.
ProfCrash is offline   Reply With Quote