View Single Post
Old 04-09-2012, 02:25 PM   #9
mmat1
Berti
mmat1 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mmat1 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mmat1 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mmat1 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mmat1 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mmat1 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mmat1 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mmat1 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mmat1 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mmat1 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mmat1 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
mmat1's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,197
Karma: 4985964
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Zischebattem
Device: Acer Lumiread
Quote:
Originally Posted by eping View Post
So I'm thinking if commercial way can make Sigil better and better, at least, a steady revenue can support its development and improvement.
I'm a bit puzzles why you think that this will make things better.

Free developers aren't able to handle huge projects ? What's this Linux, Firefox etc. etc. etc. I heard recently about ???

Free developers aren't able to deliver quality software ?? I think, sometimes the opposite is the case. If money gets short, companies often forced to throw their stuff on the market - ready or not - to get some cash. Free developers are free to deliver 3 stability and bugfix releases in sequence, as they don't have to pay their rent with the money they get for their software...
For me there isn't a causal connection. If the developer does a good job, software will be fine, otherwise trash. Doing a good job isn't always a question of money.
mmat1 is offline   Reply With Quote