View Single Post
Old 04-06-2012, 02:16 PM   #23
BoldlyDubious
what if...?
BoldlyDubious ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.BoldlyDubious ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.BoldlyDubious ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.BoldlyDubious ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.BoldlyDubious ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.BoldlyDubious ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.BoldlyDubious ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.BoldlyDubious ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.BoldlyDubious ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.BoldlyDubious ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.BoldlyDubious ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
BoldlyDubious's Avatar
 
Posts: 209
Karma: 750870
Join Date: Feb 2011
Device: paper & electrophoretic
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steven Lyle Jordan View Post


Businesses are in business to sell products. There is nothing implicit in the business model that a business has to accept back a properly-functioning product, just because the purchaser decided not to use it. The fact that a business won't allow you to return, for refund or exchange, one of their products is not a defacto reason of condemnation.
This is an interesting angle. I agree: I have no right to demand legal action to modify a business model, if it doesn't suit me. So, do businessmen in the media market have the right to demand that the law is changed in order to make their business model feasible in the face of changed market and technology conditions?
BoldlyDubious is offline   Reply With Quote