[Andrew H.]

Originally Posted by Nexutix

Buying a new device is not an option for everyone, especially when the device costs a chunk of one's wage. Greater that 3/4th of the consumers wouldn't invest in the device again just to regain the functionality, especially in time of economic crisis one might be facing.

I think that consumers have some responsibility here. If you really can't afford to put all of your eggs in one Easter basket, you should avoid from doing that.

This depicts an evil strategy of device manufacturer to achieve higher monetary gain, by making user dependent on a short-lived device. Isn't it same as drug-dealer's strategy?

I don't think that "evil" is the correct characterization at all. Do you think it would be less evil if Apple sold the iPad without e-mail functionality because it would make me less dependent on it? I don't think so.

And I'm not quite sure that these devices are particularly short lived, as far as that goes. I have an old Handspring Visor from 1999 (I think) which still works. It's completely obsolete, but still as functional as it ever was. I think in the vast majority of cases, people replace technology like this when it become obsolete, not when it wears out.

The question that arises is: How can you settle with the "function"?

1. One time investment: A multipurpose device with considerably good longevity and sustainability.
2. Decentralization of functions: Multiple single purpose devices, which would ensure non-dependence for an individual.

As my personal opinion, Desktops, laptops and eInk readers have better longevity and reliability in comparison with smartphones and tablets.

This isn't really an either or question, and I think that you have significantly overstated the dependency argument, since most people have fallback devices. To take the most extreme example - if my iPhone fell into Lake Michigan and vanished without a trace, and I couldn't afford to buy a new one - I could buy a no-contact smartphone for under $100 at best buy and still have access to e-mail, texts, and internet.

If my iPad were destroyed, I would still be able to use my normal computer.

If my Kindle were destroyed, I could read on my computer or phone. (Not that replacing a Kindle is very expensive).