View Single Post
Old 04-06-2012, 12:17 PM   #106
DiapDealer
Grand Sorcerer
DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
DiapDealer's Avatar
 
Posts: 28,625
Karma: 204624552
Join Date: Jan 2010
Device: Nexus 7, Kindle Fire HD
Quote:
First, Apple does not want to be a wholesale purchaser of e-books, even for six months or a year. It doesn’t want to price e-books, and it doesn’t want to bear the risk that e-books don’t sell. It’s not equipped for that.
Which would be relevant only if Apple limited themselves to the sale of ebooks from Agency Publishers only. But they don't. So the idea that they're not equipped to do their own ebook pricing is just not correct. They price ebooks all the time. Nor is it correct that a non-agency agreement would somehow force them to purchase a "certain quantity" of a particular ebook and be "stuck" with whatever didn't sell. That's just silly.

Was that quoted statement even remotely serious with those arguments?

Last edited by DiapDealer; 04-06-2012 at 12:19 PM.
DiapDealer is online now   Reply With Quote