View Single Post
Old 04-05-2012, 06:50 PM   #23
xg4bx
Are you gonna eat that?
xg4bx ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.xg4bx ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.xg4bx ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.xg4bx ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.xg4bx ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.xg4bx ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.xg4bx ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.xg4bx ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.xg4bx ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.xg4bx ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.xg4bx ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
xg4bx's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,633
Karma: 23215128
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Phillipsburg, NJ
Device: Kindle 3, Nook STG
Quote:
Originally Posted by stonetools View Post
I think what I'm trying for is if anyone has come up with some solid rationale -business, economic or political, of why we should want to plant colonies on the Moon, or Mars, or the Belt. Just about everyone starts " Assume a Moon base...."
The sci-fi old timers tend to analogize the colonization of space with the voyages of Columbus, or opening of the West. The problem is, once Columbus got to the New World, there were obvious business opportunies-there were resources to exploit, land to cultivate, people to enslave ( OK, the SF old timers usually skipped over that last).
There really is no good business reason for establishing an O'Neill colony or building a domed City on Mars. Solar powersats probably aren't enough. Anyway, I'm probably just ranting to no purpose at thispoint.
the aforementioned Spin by Robert Charles Wilson has a pretty compelling reason: survival of the species.

i'm sure the premise has been done before but i see your point. generally sf seems to be more 'hey lets go because we can' than 'hey lets go because we have to'.
xg4bx is offline   Reply With Quote