View Single Post
Old 04-04-2012, 04:10 PM   #345
ApK
Award-Winning Participant
ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 7,389
Karma: 68329346
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: NJ, USA
Device: Kindle
Quote:
Originally Posted by ScalyFreak View Post
Exactly. Not the buyer. But the traffic laws and regulations are there to protect the buyer of a car, not the seller. There are other laws for that. So we're back to DRM having a negative effect for the buyer of the eBook, and the positive aspects of it never applying to the customer other than indirectly and at best very vaguely.
I don't see anything inherently wrong with that idea. This is the writer's section. I presumed the title of this thread referred to whether DRM was good or bad for the writers. Any goodness DRM might offer a writer would be evidenced as direct to their bottom line, but all the badness to the writer that we are pointing out is only indirect and vague. Goodwill, problems maybe down the road, possible lost sales to anti-DRMers, possible lost sales resulting from sharing, etc.
ApK is offline