View Single Post
Old 04-03-2012, 11:35 AM   #104
murraypaul
Interested Bystander
murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 3,726
Karma: 19728152
Join Date: Jun 2008
Device: Note 4, Kobo One
Quote:
Originally Posted by HansTWN View Post
The act in 1790 you mentioned was the first general copyright act.
In the US maybe.
The Statute of Anne in the UK beat it by 80 years. The US 1790 act takes several elements from the UK 1710 act, including the 14 year renewable period.

http://www.copyrighthistory.com/anne.html
Quote:
An Act for the Encouragement of Learning, by Vesting the Copies of Printed Books in the Authors or Purchasers of such Copies, during the Times therein mentioned.
It also required copies of each book to be deposited in what would nowadays be called Copyright Libraries, and a process whereby members of the public could complain about prices which were too high or unreasonable.

Last edited by murraypaul; 04-03-2012 at 11:43 AM.
murraypaul is offline   Reply With Quote