Quote:
Originally Posted by QuantumIguana
The benefit is lost with either no copyright or with eternal copyright. With no copyright, there is no incentive to create, so the work doesn't exist. With eternal copyright, the public cannot benefit from the work.
|
Who says the public needs to benefit?
Quote:
|
It's not my rules. It is basic logic. You and Giggleton have a lot on common.
|
Why does "if someone creates something unique, it's theirs" need further explanation. It's a very simple concept.
Quote:
|
The law doesn't matter, you are attempting to appeal to natural law, in essence, youre going "over the head" of the law. If the public domain is theft, then anyone who uses the public domain is a thief, regardless of what the law says.
|
I'm only advocating a change in current laws.
Quote:
|
Book burning without the smoke.
|
If that's what you believe, go for it.