View Single Post
Old 03-31-2012, 03:34 AM   #40
bevdeforges
Addict
bevdeforges ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.bevdeforges ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.bevdeforges ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.bevdeforges ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.bevdeforges ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.bevdeforges ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.bevdeforges ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.bevdeforges ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.bevdeforges ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.bevdeforges ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.bevdeforges ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
bevdeforges's Avatar
 
Posts: 288
Karma: 1094000
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Essonne, France
Device: Kobo Forma; Sony PRS600B; Sony 350; Sony T-2
I'm all for the author benefiting from his or her creation during their lifetime. Not so keen on endowing the heirs with long-lasting benefits. If the author didn't bother to put any of the profits away for the heirs, why should the system do so for them? (What if the author didn't want his or her heirs to benefit? What if they have no heirs? Why encourage distant "cousins" to come out of the woodwork like that?)

I'd be satisfied with a life-of-the-author term, with perhaps a fixed minimum (10 years, perhaps). For corporate copyright holders, there should be a reasonable fixed term - perhaps as much as 50 years, but certainly no longer.
bevdeforges is offline   Reply With Quote