Quote:
Originally Posted by Harmon
In principle, I don't see anything wrong with that. It's not just "take it away from them." It's "take it away from them and pay for it."
In practice, it might not be wise.
|
In practice, "pay for it" means somebody has to decide what it's worth. That process is called "politics," and the company that has something taken away from them will always lose.
So, yeah, in practice, it doesn't seem like a good choice.