View Single Post
Old 03-30-2012, 03:12 PM   #16
tubemonkey
monkey on the fringe
tubemonkey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tubemonkey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tubemonkey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tubemonkey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tubemonkey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tubemonkey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tubemonkey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tubemonkey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tubemonkey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tubemonkey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tubemonkey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
tubemonkey's Avatar
 
Posts: 45,746
Karma: 158575914
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Seattle Metro
Device: Moto E6, Echo Show
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ninjalawyer View Post
And I'm in favour of common sense and ideas that aren't nonsense. I don't even understand what additional incentive you think creators would get out of this that is above what they receive under the current system, or why you don't think creators would be harmed by cutting off the public domain.
There is no incentive. It's a matter of property rights. Books belong to the copyright holders and it should be up them to determine disposition.

I see no difference between land and books. If land can be passed on generation after generation, then so should books.
tubemonkey is offline   Reply With Quote