View Single Post
Old 03-30-2012, 01:00 PM   #37
murraypaul
Interested Bystander
murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 3,726
Karma: 19728152
Join Date: Jun 2008
Device: Note 4, Kobo One
Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrew H. View Post
I disagree. It's not about courtesy, it's about choosing to not be cowardly. Priest has shown that he has standards, and that he is not afraid to speak up when he feels those standards are being violated. This is a good thing, and it's something we need more of, not less of.

These are all successful, well-known authors. They can deal with the criticism, and if they can't, they should be in another field. (And Stross is taking the Internet puppy title and running with it, so he's clearly able to take it).

No one is well served if people withhold criticism on an important matter because they don't want to look like an ass. If Priest believes that the Clarke prize is going in the wrong direction, he has a *duty* to speak up, which, happily, he has.
But when the subtext is that his book wasn't included in the list, any rant like this is going to seem like sour grapes, and that maybe he is the one who can't take the criticism.
murraypaul is offline   Reply With Quote