Thread: Smashwords defends agency model in new editorial?
View Single Post
Old 03-30-2012, 03:06 AM   #4
phenomshel
ZCD BombShel
phenomshel ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.phenomshel ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.phenomshel ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.phenomshel ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.phenomshel ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.phenomshel ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.phenomshel ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.phenomshel ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.phenomshel ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.phenomshel ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.phenomshel ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
phenomshel's Avatar
 
Posts: 4,793
Karma: 8293322
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: The Frozen North (aka Illinois, USA)
Device: iPad, STB Kindle Oasis
Quote:
Originally Posted by FizzyWater View Post
I skimmed over all the numbers, but it sounds more like a plea to keep Agency pricing because more people are turning from the mainstream publishers and taking a chance on all the no-names, self-published, and previously published backlist books on Smashwords.

It probably is good for them. It doesn't mean it's good for readers who want established authors' new releases...
Brava!!! Exactly what I would have said, and more eloquently put.
phenomshel is offline   Reply With Quote