View Single Post
Old 03-30-2012, 02:11 AM   #1
scrapking
Evangelist
scrapking ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.scrapking ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.scrapking ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.scrapking ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.scrapking ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.scrapking ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.scrapking ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.scrapking ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.scrapking ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.scrapking ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.scrapking ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
scrapking's Avatar
 
Posts: 467
Karma: 1073260
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Victoria, BC
Device: Kobo Vox, Kobo Glo
Smashwords defends agency model in new editorial?

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/mark-c...b_1387815.html

I don't know where to begin in disagreeing with the above article. I question the relevance of Smashwords' pricing trend compared to that of the major publishers. I think he's borderline delusional to suggest the agency model hasn't raised prices. And, most of all, I think he entirely misses the point on the DoJ complaint (it isn't about pricing so much as the alleged collusion between Apple and publishers).

Please note: I posted this on my iPad and, dammit, autocorrect turned Smashwords into two words in the title and I missed it, dagnabbit. :-(

Last edited by Dr. Drib; 03-30-2012 at 11:02 AM. Reason: title 'fixed' [Smash words] to [Smashwords]
scrapking is offline   Reply With Quote