View Single Post
Old 03-28-2012, 03:09 PM   #19
knc1
Going Viral
knc1 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.knc1 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.knc1 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.knc1 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.knc1 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.knc1 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.knc1 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.knc1 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.knc1 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.knc1 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.knc1 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
knc1's Avatar
 
Posts: 17,212
Karma: 18210809
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Central Texas
Device: No K1, PW2, KV, KOA
Quote:
Originally Posted by geekmaster View Post
EDIT: I added the MIT license to the above script. I suppose I need to add it to my other published scripts and C programs now... And for that matter, is it even a LEGAL license if the copyright holder is identified by a pseudonym?
Now there is a good test question for students of some legal forum.

My layman's guess is "yes", since many printed books are published under a pseudonym.

For the prior musing...

I have seen people just include a reference in their signature to their intended license.

Something I often do myself is:

License Name, <link>, included wherein by reference.

(If you type small, you can get it on one line in the source. Which helps deal with the problem of the license text being longer than the code.)


But I am not an attorney licensed to practice law, so readers of this thread should make their own decision (or hire a legal decision).
knc1 is offline   Reply With Quote