View Single Post
Old 03-28-2012, 11:50 AM   #13
geekmaster
Carpe diem, c'est la vie.
geekmaster ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.geekmaster ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.geekmaster ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.geekmaster ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.geekmaster ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.geekmaster ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.geekmaster ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.geekmaster ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.geekmaster ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.geekmaster ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.geekmaster ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
geekmaster's Avatar
 
Posts: 6,433
Karma: 10773670
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Multiverse 6627A
Device: K1 to PW3
Quote:
Originally Posted by hawhill View Post
I really hope that my diplomatic interventions are not annoying. Please tell me if they are.
Interesting, informative, and welcome!

I use open-source in commercial projects, so I am fond of MIT, BSD, CPOL, and similar licenses so I do not have to use DLLs. I *do* use LGPL occasionally, such as the tinycc DLL and the SDL 1.2 DLL, which are LGPL and allow dynamic linking to commercial projects, but it is an annoyance.

What license do you recommend, so that I (and others) can reuse my code in commercial projects?
http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/2007/04/pick-a-license-any-license.html
The license shown above reportedly belongs to an atomic power plant in Moscow.

EDIT: I added the MIT license to the above script. I suppose I need to add it to my other published scripts and C programs now... And for that matter, is it even a LEGAL license if the copyright holder is identified by a pseudonym?

Last edited by geekmaster; 08-06-2012 at 07:59 PM.
geekmaster is offline   Reply With Quote