View Single Post
Old 03-27-2012, 11:36 AM   #30
obsessed2
Wizard
obsessed2 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.obsessed2 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.obsessed2 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.obsessed2 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.obsessed2 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.obsessed2 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.obsessed2 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.obsessed2 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.obsessed2 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.obsessed2 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.obsessed2 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
obsessed2's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,041
Karma: 4694121
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Virginia
Device: Pocket Edge X 2 , Edge, gTab, Kindle Fire, Nextbook 7S
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob Lister View Post
This is so very much ado over so very little nothing. I feel like I must be missing something critical. Batterygate!? Is this really what passes for scandal here?

I agree, the title could of ZDnet's story chould have been different. It's just a catchy headline to get the readers attention. The article is not really saying there is a scandal but merely that iPad owners are losing up to an hour of potential use time because of incorrectly reported battery charge percentage.

In other words 100% on the battery meter does not mean your battery is 100% charged, it really means it's 90% charged. Imagine if your car's gas gauge said you had a full tank but in reality it's only 7/8 full. If you have a 20 gallon tank that's 2.5 gallons short. If your car gets 30 miles a gallon this means you can drive almost an extra 100 miles before fill up. If your battery is at 100% instead of 90% you get an extra hour of use before having to recharge.
obsessed2 is offline   Reply With Quote