View Single Post
Old 03-24-2012, 09:06 AM   #19
Ninjalawyer
Guru
Ninjalawyer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Ninjalawyer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Ninjalawyer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Ninjalawyer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Ninjalawyer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Ninjalawyer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Ninjalawyer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Ninjalawyer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Ninjalawyer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Ninjalawyer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Ninjalawyer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Ninjalawyer's Avatar
 
Posts: 826
Karma: 18573626
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Canada
Device: Kobo Touch, Nexus 7 (2013)
Quote:
Originally Posted by CommonReader View Post
To my knowledge all apps that are being sold via Apple's store have to be approved by Apple first. They also take 30% of the sales revenue for themselves. That seems sufficient reasons to me to hold them responsible for IP violations.
Just so I understand, you're saying Apple should be responsible for IP violations because it makes money by running a digital storefront? Checking for IP violation is a lot harder than you think and difficult even when you spend a lot of time doing it; it's not particularly feasible for Apple to check every app to make sure something the app writer didn't sneak in something that's covered by someone else's copyright.
Ninjalawyer is offline   Reply With Quote