View Single Post
Old 03-24-2012, 04:41 AM   #151
gmw
cacoethes scribendi
gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
gmw's Avatar
 
Posts: 5,818
Karma: 137770742
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Australia
Device: Kobo Aura One & H2Ov2, Sony PRS-650
Quote:
Originally Posted by Elfwreck View Post
[...]There's a big difference between taking something *away* from you, and changing the marketplace so that your efforts are no longer suitable for sale. While changing the marketplace might be wrong, and might even be a crime, it's not "theft."
That may (or may not, I'm no lawyer) be technically/legally correct, but the effect on the victim is, or can be*, the same as theft. If I don't pay my plumber all I've taken from him was his ability to work somewhere else while he was working here (and maybe a bit of sealing tape). That may not be technical theft either, but the impact on my plumber may* well be the same as if I had taken the money from his pocket. It may not technically be theft, but the difference doesn't seem so "big" from where I'm sitting.

(*) I've seen the arguments about there wouldn't have been a sale anyway, or maybe my plumber didn't have any other work available at the time, but that is a presumption that the perpetrator is (usually) not in a position to make, and in most examples I've seen they don't really care anyway, it just sounds good as an excuse.
gmw is offline