View Single Post
Old 06-20-2008, 09:39 AM   #23
catsittingstill
Guru
catsittingstill ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.catsittingstill ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.catsittingstill ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.catsittingstill ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.catsittingstill ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.catsittingstill ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.catsittingstill ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.catsittingstill ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.catsittingstill ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.catsittingstill ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.catsittingstill ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
catsittingstill's Avatar
 
Posts: 643
Karma: 551634
Join Date: Dec 2007
Device: Kindle 1.0.8, iPod Touch, Kindle Keyboard
Maybe we need a new poll, something like:

Kindle is mostly for:
Women
Men
Readers: gender doesn't matter.

I had some trouble answering the original poll; my first reaction was "well of course it's for women (too); it's not like you need a body part women don't have in order to press the buttons." My second reaction was, "oh, you mean, is it meant for women and not men. Of course not; it's meant for people who read."

As for romance books being available; I don't think that proves anything about gender ratio in Kindle usage. For one thing, I have at least one male friend who has a whole wall full of romance books. For another, a lack of romance books might show they were not paying attention to women as a market sector. But the mere fact that they *are* paying attention to women doesn't mean they're excluding men in any way. It's not an either-or proposition.
catsittingstill is offline   Reply With Quote