View Single Post
Old 03-21-2012, 09:37 PM   #25
cjr72
Groupie
cjr72 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.cjr72 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.cjr72 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.cjr72 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.cjr72 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.cjr72 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.cjr72 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.cjr72 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.cjr72 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.cjr72 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.cjr72 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 172
Karma: 2900000
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: A Yankee in Texas
Device: Nexus 6p, Nexus 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by Penforhire View Post
cjr, I'm certainly pro-science and research. My day job is R&D management. But the majority of professional authors are going to write what sells. It does feel like a dark future is what sells now. And zombies, lol. I notice today's stories still most often have hope and success as their theme ('even against such darkness and long odds our hero does his thing').

One of the darkest of my recent dystopian reads, Charlie Huston's "Sleepless," has a ray of hope at the end (a child survives).

There are pollyanna (my dad used to call the whole upbeat approach "Disney") authors still doing their thing too. But the market will trend to follow the money.
Understood. And I never meant to imply that you or anybody else is ant-science. I'm not necessarily advocating against darker themes, I tend to gravitate towards them myself. Still, I'll be interested to see what comes of Neal Stephenson's project.
cjr72 is offline   Reply With Quote