Quote:
Originally Posted by anamardoll
Well then, quite frankly, I can't follow how you converse.  
When Party A says "pay for a service, expect to be monitored" and Party B says "not with phone calls, why with internet" and Party C says "oh, sure, you can totes monitor phone calls" while quoting Party B as a response, it looks like Party C is (1) arguing with Party B and (2) implying that such a thing is legal and appropriate.
If that's not what you meant, why did you say what you said in response to Elfwreck and what were you trying to say? If you just wanted to say that someone has the physical ability to record phone calls, that was never in dispute -- Elfwreck was saying that phone companies cannot legally record phone calls, so ISP providers should not legally be able to record all internet traffic. (IIUC) |
Not sure what you mean by "oh, sure, you can totes monitor phone calls" but I am sure I never said that. And I never said or implied it was right or legal to monitor phone calls or email or downloads etc. I did want to say that the party has the physical abilty to monitor the calls and whether it is in dispute or not I should be allowed to say it without someone going all haywire at me. And making/stating wild assumptions based on party A-B-C conversations without actually quoting any seems a bit iffy.
Seems I have seriously offended you by disagreeing with some of your posts in the past although many of them I have supported as well.
I have some strong opinions at times and not all are right, but I mean no personal offense usually.
Helen