Quote:
Originally Posted by speakingtohe
Who said that and how? Certainly wasn't me. I said that renting was not a service. So IMO no such rights as previously discussed apply. And nowhere did I read that anyone thought they should.
Helen
|
I'm referencing multiple people, but if you want to talk about you, yes, your post leads me to understand that you, specifically, think AT&T should be able to record any conversations I have. Which could include "
having their sexual relations with their spouse taped".
But I concur that would be for the enjoyment of the AT&T board of directors, not the landlord in the case of your apparent statement that phone calls can be legally monitored or recorded by the provider at their whim.
ETA: I'd also be interested to know why renting a house is not a "service" in your book, but renting a phone number or an IP address is a "service".