Quote:
Originally Posted by Kymmmm
I suppose they are a bit dated now and so is their writing style. 1950's, 60's?
A more ignorant and trusting age. Heinlein definitely had his 'Daddy' issues and it showed. I bet he was cranky that Hubbard actually got his religion off the ground whereas R.H's never got past the 'grok' disciples.
Kymmmm
|
Which is a crying shame IMO.
I think I would actually prefer that to Scientology for the most part, or at least it would make for more entertaining competition than the usual religious competition.
Actually considering the other thread, maybe that would be a great idea for a alt-history. Where it really did get off the ground in competition with Hubbards religion. I'd read it at any rate, knowing Heinlein or not it would still be an interesting read.
Maybe I'll cross post that over there actually.