View Single Post
Old 03-16-2012, 08:25 PM   #31
teh603
Autism Spectrum Disorder
teh603 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.teh603 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.teh603 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.teh603 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.teh603 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.teh603 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.teh603 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.teh603 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.teh603 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.teh603 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.teh603 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
teh603's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,212
Karma: 6244877
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Coastal Texas
Device: Android Phone
Quote:
Originally Posted by ilovejedd View Post
Realize that. However, Linux distros are obviously legal to distribute. Just wanted to point out a couple of scenarios where you might receive a nasty letter when you haven't actually done any infringing.

You're right about *buntu torrents being much faster compared to normal HTTP/FTP servers. I was getting 2~4MB/s when I downloaded Karmic.
Depends on what packages you use; some of the ones in *-restricted-extras and the Medibuntu repositories are illegal in a lot of corporatized nations. Libdvdcss2 is a particularly sticky one because that's the one that allows you to play (by breaking the encryption on) DVDs. That's why they're kept in the repositories in the first place.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ilovejedd View Post
Doesn't Blizzard use torrents (or at least some form of peer-to-peer connection) to distribute updates and reduce load on their servers? I read the fine print on my StarCraft II manual/ToS and they give you permission to distribute the software as long as it remains unaltered. I'll have to double-check the new License Agreement for Windows 7 but I think it also says the same thing (of course, sharing your product key is another matter).
Blizz uses a surprisingly modern business model; instead of selling on a per-copy basis, they sell on a per-account one and charge an "about right" for access. A lot of other game companies seem to be more concerned about protecting their client using ever-increasing DRM or other screwball methods (like the DCU Online game launcher's requiring some version of Internet Explorer for unspecified reasons). Makes me wonder if they "farm out" a lot of processing to the game client, thus making it vulnerable to cheaters.

Quote:
Seriously, I don't know how they're going to implement this. I think there may be a lot of false positives when they eventually do.
No idea either, and I wouldn't be surprised if there were lawsuits out the you can guess where. Quite frankly, though, I'm amazed nobody tried to force this sooner on the pretext of hunting down child porn.
teh603 is offline   Reply With Quote