Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve Jordan
I'm specifically NOT speaking in such absolutes. I have frequently used the phrase "some security," to make it clear that no system will be 100% secure. "Some security" brings risk to a manageable level, making it possible to transact business, accept some level of loss, and still make a profit.
|
Then what is your point?
Where is the actual problem in the darknet and the current laws?
Are you selling e-books? Yes. Do you see a great impact of having your books on the darknet? No.
So ... it is possible to transact business and still make a profit.
Okay, interpret me as being silly and slow: What is the problem with the current law and system? The concrete probleme.
Quote:
|
FACT: It was funded partially by the U.S. military, and partially by other federal government agencies. It was created by university scientists seeking ways to share research data.
|
It originated in the ARPAnet - a military institution. But yes, one of the problems is, that the original technology was never designed for a network that large. Another problem are national laws and governments meddling in the technology and the evolution of the network. But this is OT.
Quote:
|
Most? No. The most extreme and infamous... yes. And again, you are referring to the most extreme cases to make your point.
|
Nope. The percentage of hackers getting caught is higher then the percentage of e.g. store-thiefes getting caught.
The same for viral designers.