Dear ignacio ferrer,
have you read the title of this thread?
have you noticed @lorenzoens calls always JBC an "gadget" instead of eReader?
I can accept the sane criticism like the one of lady Valentinka, but when someone tell me:
Quote:
|
hey I have no JBC but according to me is rubbish because: A B C.
|
And you answer:
Quote:
|
You are right on some point but according to me this is a very good device for particular purpose because in my experience: X Y Z (there are a lot of threads here and I'm bored to cite them)
|
Well, I understand we are on two different planets of ideas. It is not a bad thing.
But even if I would think, for mere example, your M92 is not a good reader (and I don't think so, it is just an example) because eink is B/W and it's too static, I would not even dream to call M92 a "gadget" because I'd know there are benefits in a static B/W eink.
And most of all ok, I understand (even if I disagree) these reasons. Is it useful to repeat them in every posts?
Instead I would appreciate to find solutions (in this way of view I was tipping lady Valentinka but I was missed the point) and ideas of improvements to forward to Ectaco technical support.
I missed the point with @Valentinka because I didn't realize soon she has got the decision to return its "gadget" and so it is useless tipping her. It was my fault, I'm sorry.
AM