View Single Post
Old 03-15-2012, 11:34 AM   #33
Wasgo
Connoisseur
Wasgo ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Wasgo ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Wasgo ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Wasgo ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Wasgo ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Wasgo ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Wasgo ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Wasgo ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Wasgo ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Wasgo ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Wasgo ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 82
Karma: 1060105
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Device: Kobo Wi-Fi
Quote:
Originally Posted by nogle View Post
No, it doesn't trump all. When tested in court, a judge can strike down portions of a law without negating the entire law.
It also doesn't trump it as their is no statutory damages for violating the provision for personal use. In fact, there are no consequences in bill for personal use at all. It could be that a revision of this bill causes harm, but this one doesn't.
Wasgo is offline   Reply With Quote