Thread: No more EB
View Single Post
Old 03-14-2012, 09:40 AM   #18
QuantumIguana
Philosopher
QuantumIguana ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.QuantumIguana ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.QuantumIguana ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.QuantumIguana ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.QuantumIguana ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.QuantumIguana ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.QuantumIguana ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.QuantumIguana ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.QuantumIguana ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.QuantumIguana ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.QuantumIguana ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
QuantumIguana's Avatar
 
Posts: 2,034
Karma: 18736532
Join Date: Jan 2012
Device: Kindle Paperwhite 2 gen, Kindle Fire 1st Gen, Kindle Touch
The Encyclopaedia Britannica was once a sign of wealth and education. It looked good on the shelf, and impressed people that you had it. People would assume that you had read it, and that may or may not have been true. But if you just want information, there are cheaper sources.

I use Wikipedia quite a lot, and take a "trust but verify" attitude toward it. There was a study in 2005 that found Wikipedia to be as accurate as EB http://news.cnet.com/2100-1038_3-5997332.html

If the article is non-controversial, I'm less skeptical about it, if it is controversial, I pay closer attention to the primary sources.
QuantumIguana is offline   Reply With Quote